Skip to content
July 12, 2013 / JV

The Zimmerman Trial Through an Abolitionist Lens


Dead weight seems to hang in the air as we wait for the verdict in the trial of George Zimmerman. My fears and hopes feel hinged on each shallow exhale as I sit at the kitchen table, sifting through articles, nibbling oatmeal, talking heads muted. Like many people I know, I’ve been angry. The murder of Trayvon Martin has been about a young person who was presumed suspicious, followed, and shot in the chest on his way back to his father’s house after stepping out for a snack. It is surely about that. But it has also been about black men everywhere who are read as a threat. It has been about the ease with which the police took Zimmerman’s word when he said he acted in self-defense, and those weeks he lived regular life after having murdered someone in cold blood. It’s especially about these facts when considered in relationship to how many black and brown people go to prison for comparatively minuscule reasons: shoplifting a candy bar, driving a little bit fast, firing a warning shot during an abusive encounter.

We have consistently been told that this is “not about race,” perhaps strategically, perhaps not. But of course — in a country where there is a $2 million bounty on the head of a black woman for allegedly killing a police officer, while a police officer who participated in the harassment and murder of a black man in front of the world on a BART platform is serving in the army — it is about race. However, it’s about race in ways other than the egregious dissimilarities between treatment of black life and white life. It’s also about the colors of the punishment system, and how we think through our relationship to it as a whole. As a person who is against the carceral state, I have struggled with my feelings about the Zimmerman trial. If I truly believe in prison abolition, then it cannot, seemingly, be a sometimes commitment.

As I await the jury, heart in stomach, I am trying to think about how this whole situation could have gone differently through an abolitionist lens. What if, when people became outraged that Zimmerman was “roaming free,” they had demanded transformative justice rather than arrest? What if, rather than sitting there dopily, George Zimmerman would have had to explain himself to Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton? A friend of mine who advocates community conflict resolution, even to the point of violence, suggests George Zimmerman deserved to get whatever may or may not have come to him without state intervention. Are these our alternatives? What do we want?

It feels easier to think about prison abolition when we confront all the damage the punishment system — which includes laws, their enforcement, and the multiple institutions and relationships involved in those practices — does to people’s lives. As the United States is home to 5% of the world’s population and 25% of the world’s prison population, the severity of the problem is blatant. As we consider the disproportionate number of black and brown people who are targeted by surveillance and other punitive procedures, the violence is clear. But if we also acknowledge that the institution itself cannot be redeemed, then that means working against its domination, even — and particularly — in cases like Zimmerman’s, when we may not be sympathetic to the potentially incarcerated. Everyday abolition has to be about thinking of ways to address conflict and harm outside of the punishment system, on a regular basis. I’m asking you to think with me about the ways that this may be possible.

If George Zimmerman is convicted, perhaps there will be a moment of joy for a lot of people across the country: here, this apparently unapologetic man who murdered a teenage boy, will be locked away for some years. He will, maybe, feel regret or fear or hurt in prison. But, for each George Zimmerman, how many black, brown, trans, gender noncomforming, undocumented, or homeless people will also be locked away? And for what we might deem far lesser reasons? How many people with disabilities or medical needs will be confined to some kind of institution, be it called a prison or a hospital?

As we sit, wait, and watch, with our hearts in our stomachs and the weight of black death in the air, what are our long term hopes for the future of this carceral state?

Posted at Postbourgie.



Leave a Comment
  1. Tyrell J. / Jul 14 2013 2:40 pm

    Thank God Almighty that we have a court of *LAW* and not a court of *JUSTICE*. Justice might be an eye for an eye – regardless of how that eye was lost in the first place. The Law, however, says that if you are in fear for your life you may defend yourself (this was never a stand your ground case).

    You’re ignorant of criminal law as well as the evidence and ‘facts’ presented through this case. Martin didn’t run from George Zimmerman, if you listen to the 911 tape you’d know that he first circled Zimmerman’s car, then started walking – and eventually running or skipping – away. At that point, Zimmerman got out of his car and followed him. If you paid any attention to the trial, or if you would know anything about criminal defense law, you would know that the prosecution had absolutely no evidence proving their claims. Their star witness was not even credible as she lied twice during depositions.

    Why wasn’t his family worried about him that night when he didn’t come back home? If he was truly a child, they (his dad and step mom when they got home, his brother who had been home with him) would not have been able to all go to sleep without him returning home from a simple trip to the store. Instead, they didn’t even seem to notice he was gone until the next day when they found out he had been killed — his brother found out only after returning home from school. Of course, since Trayvon was suspended from school at the time, it wouldn’t have been suspicious that he wasn’t in school that monday.

    All in all, I think it is incredibly sad how, in situations like this when certain groups of people ignore evidence and side with one party, race becomes an issue in a case where the only racism that was shown at trial was Trayvon Martin’s racism towards any light skinned ‘crackers’. Why can’t people just admit he did something dumb and caused his own death? He didn’t know that Zimmerman was armed – he attacked Zimmerman and was eventually shot and killed. It’s his own fault! And if Zimmerman was black and Martin was white I would be saying the same thing!

    All the evidence corroborated the self defense claim. The fact that his sweatshirt provided evidence that he was shot at point blank, but his autopsy provided evidence that the gun was between 2-4″ (inches) from his chest when it went off. This could only be possible if he was on top of Zimmerman. If Zimmerman was on top of him then the sweatshirt and gun would have been point blank to Martin’s chest as well as his hoodie.

    I’m black and from Chicago, and I am ashamed to be black when things like this happen because it prevents peace between interracial communities.

  2. maeganmillerblog / Jul 23 2013 11:06 am

    Reblogged this on Cityscapes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: